Facebook

Many of us are also on Facebook! We cross-post all events on Meetup and Facebook, so you’d rather follow us there, here’s the link.

Not on Facebook? You can just check it out from right here. (You miss out on all the comments, though.)


Live from Facebook!

Hey, for Salon tomorrow, please note:

Our house is VERY much a work in progress. The floors are unfinished, things are old and weird and we're not completely moved in. This will be an experiment. :)

DO NOT TAKE YOUR SHOES OFF. There are tacks in the floor that we might have missed. Besides, there's nothing to damage.

Parking doesn't require a permit in the area, so park anywhere there's space. Don't park in the alley, or in any business parking lot. Sunnyside close to Pulaski might be a good option.

Our house has the little free library in the front. It's the corner of Sunnyside and Kasson, just next to Karlov. This is the "Krazy Ks" neighborhood. Expect to get lost.
... See MoreSee Less

July 27th, 2:15 pm  ·  

When is it appropriate for skepticism to be applied to politics? When politicians ignore or invent facts. See John Oliver's recent end-of-convention recap.

Skeptics are the quiet, irritating minority who are here to remind people that - while your feelings are important - facts should be the basis for decisions.

Feeling afraid doesn't mean that there is anything to fear. Feeling insecure about the economy doesn't mean that the economy is weak.

I don't believe that skeptics should be the group that comments on policy or vision; but when you make a statement about reality, there is one group that will compare that statement to what we can measure.
... See MoreSee Less

July 25th, 12:30 pm  ·  

Beth Voigt created an event for Chicago Skeptics. ... See MoreSee Less

Believing in Things We Cannot See

August 20, 2016, 12:30pm

Is belief without sight rational? God may be beyond human comprehension, but then again, so is most science - at least to us mere mortals (with Liberal Arts degrees). Scientists have never seen quarks, black holes, or dark matter, but all three form the foundation of the modern scientific understanding of the world. This talk will discuss ways that all people – believers and skeptics alike – can use the tools of science to expand their understanding of what it means to “believe.” About our speaker: By day, Christian Keil is a recent graduate of the University of Michigan and an innovation consultant. But by night, he is the author of Agnostic-ish: the tale of his journey to understand science, religion, and the world in between. Nowadays, you are most likely to find Christian just barely holding serve as a street-basketball point guard, or working on his business school application essays. To say hi or purchase Agnostic-ish, visit Christian's website at www.pronouncedkyle.com. ------------------ REMINDER: Meetups are open for speaker proposals! If you've got a topic you're passionate about, you're ready to discuss and answer questions about it, and would be okay with a sammich/beverage and our eternal gratitude as compensation, consider giving a talk for Chicago Skeptics. First-timers welcome! Interested? Know someone who might be? Email chicagoskepticamp at gmail with your ideas.

July 22nd, 3:50 pm  ·  

We have a speaker for the Meetup on Saturday!
We'll be talking about video games with Tanya DePass of I Need Diverse Games, discussing the ways in which diversity can enrich your video game experience, push the limits of immersion, present new perspectives, and ultimately foster empathy for others.
... See MoreSee Less

I Need Diverse Games

July 23, 2016, 12:30pm

If you like video games and love seeing awesome new titles with great stories and characters that everyone can really get behind, this is the talk for you. Tired of not seeing herself in the games she’s spent many years playing, Tanya DePass started #INeedDiverseGames in 2014 after being disappointed one too many times in the choices available to her in current games or games yet to come. Diversity is a way to enrich the video game experience, not a quota to be filled, or a tool to avoid criticism. Diversity is essential not just to reflect the variety of our community, but also to push the limits of immersion, to present audiences with a perspective that they have never experienced before, and ultimately, to foster empathy for others. Today, I Need Diverse Games seeks to bring projects, works and research by marginalized folks to light. We also seek to discuss, analyze and critique identity and culture in video games through a multi-faceted lens rooted in intersectionality. about our speaker: Tanya DePass is a lifelong Chicagoan who loves everything about gaming, is the #INeedDiverseGames spawn point, and wants to make it better and more inclusive for everyone. She’s the Founder and EIC of @OutofTokensCast, the Diversity Liaison for GaymerX and often speaks on issues of diversity, feminism, race, intersectionality & other topics at conventions. about I Need Diverse Games: The Purpose of our Work: • Provide a safe space for gamers of color and of any other marginalized identities (including race, gender, sexual orientation, neurodiversity, disability etc) • Provide a safe space to promote the work of creators in the gaming industry, including journalists, developers, artists that are marginalized and would otherwise go unheard. • To encourage and defend diversity in all forms of gaming, and most importantly, make sure it is done right by creating conversations that invite both critique and praise for the art of gaming. _________________________________ As a reminder, meetups are open for speaker proposals! If you've got a topic you're passionate about, you're ready to discuss and answer questions about it, and would be okay with a sammich/beverage and our eternal gratitude as compensation, consider giving a talk for Chicago Skeptics. First-timers welcome! Interested? Know someone who might be? Email chicagoskepticamp at gmail with your ideas. (If you don't email, I might forget!)

July 18th, 1:20 pm  ·  

Beth Voigt created an event for Chicago Skeptics. ... See MoreSee Less

I Need Diverse Games

July 23, 2016, 12:30pm

If you like video games and love seeing awesome new titles with great stories and characters that everyone can really get behind, this is the talk for you. Tired of not seeing herself in the games she’s spent many years playing, Tanya DePass started #INeedDiverseGames in 2014 after being disappointed one too many times in the choices available to her in current games or games yet to come. Diversity is a way to enrich the video game experience, not a quota to be filled, or a tool to avoid criticism. Diversity is essential not just to reflect the variety of our community, but also to push the limits of immersion, to present audiences with a perspective that they have never experienced before, and ultimately, to foster empathy for others. Today, I Need Diverse Games seeks to bring projects, works and research by marginalized folks to light. We also seek to discuss, analyze and critique identity and culture in video games through a multi-faceted lens rooted in intersectionality. about our speaker: Tanya DePass is a lifelong Chicagoan who loves everything about gaming, is the #INeedDiverseGames spawn point, and wants to make it better and more inclusive for everyone. She’s the Founder and EIC of @OutofTokensCast, the Diversity Liaison for GaymerX and often speaks on issues of diversity, feminism, race, intersectionality & other topics at conventions. about I Need Diverse Games: The Purpose of our Work: • Provide a safe space for gamers of color and of any other marginalized identities (including race, gender, sexual orientation, neurodiversity, disability etc) • Provide a safe space to promote the work of creators in the gaming industry, including journalists, developers, artists that are marginalized and would otherwise go unheard. • To encourage and defend diversity in all forms of gaming, and most importantly, make sure it is done right by creating conversations that invite both critique and praise for the art of gaming. _________________________________ As a reminder, meetups are open for speaker proposals! If you've got a topic you're passionate about, you're ready to discuss and answer questions about it, and would be okay with a sammich/beverage and our eternal gratitude as compensation, consider giving a talk for Chicago Skeptics. First-timers welcome! Interested? Know someone who might be? Email chicagoskepticamp at gmail with your ideas. (If you don't email, I might forget!)

July 17th, 4:34 pm  ·  

Beth Voigt created an event for Chicago Skeptics. ... See MoreSee Less

Skeptical Salon: The Signal & the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--but Some Don't

July 28, 2016, 7:30pm

We're back on for the Skeptical Salon; please note the new location! This month, we'll be reading The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail--but Some Don't by Nate Silver. amazon.com/Signal-Noise-Many-Predictions-Fail-but/dp/0143125087/ From amazon.com: "Nate Silver built an innovative system for predicting baseball performance, predicted the 2008 election within a hair’s breadth, and became a national sensation as a blogger—all by the time he was thirty. He solidified his standing as the nation's foremost political forecaster with his near perfect prediction of the 2012 election. Silver is the founder and editor in chief of FiveThirtyEight.com. Drawing on his own groundbreaking work, Silver examines the world of prediction, investigating how we can distinguish a true signal from a universe of noisy data. Most predictions fail, often at great cost to society, because most of us have a poor understanding of probability and uncertainty. Both experts and laypeople mistake more confident predictions for more accurate ones. But overconfidence is often the reason for failure. If our appreciation of uncertainty improves, our predictions can get better too. This is the “prediction paradox”: The more humility we have about our ability to make predictions, the more successful we can be in planning for the future. In keeping with his own aim to seek truth from data, Silver visits the most successful forecasters in a range of areas, from hurricanes to baseball, from the poker table to the stock market, from Capitol Hill to the NBA. He explains and evaluates how these forecasters think and what bonds they share. What lies behind their success? Are they good—or just lucky? What patterns have they unraveled? And are their forecasts really right? He explores unanticipated commonalities and exposes unexpected juxtapositions. And sometimes, it is not so much how good a prediction is in an absolute sense that matters but how good it is relative to the competition. In other cases, prediction is still a very rudimentary—and dangerous—science. Silver observes that the most accurate forecasters tend to have a superior command of probability, and they tend to be both humble and hardworking. They distinguish the predictable from the unpredictable, and they notice a thousand little details that lead them closer to the truth. Because of their appreciation of probability, they can distinguish the signal from the noise. With everything from the health of the global economy to our ability to fight terrorism dependent on the quality of our predictions, Nate Silver’s insights are an essential read."

July 11th, 11:32 pm  ·